My Concern far as paying into social programs is that under the Real ID Act of 2005, which went into full effect in 2018, hen the leap year was removed from the Calendar. In 2018, we went from 28 February 2018 to 1 March 2018 and there was no 29 February in 2018 and again in 2022, wherefore, without the leap year, it would seem that if there are 365 1/4days per year, we fell behind by two days, making Saturday 2 days behind and the Sabbath on Thursday? When it first ended, it was on Friday and that is the NOI Sabbath or rest day. And now it is Thursday Sabbath.
In Any case, it would sink this Union Almost spontaneously if we just went along with the idea of continuing the status quo. Because the problem is too many people getting benefit in proxy packets. In California anyone can just select an address and take that Real ID to any state in the Union and trade it in and become that person. You have people getting benefits in 3 or 4 different states by 2 and 3 different agencies. The idea that once determined mentally ill, you are supposed to get a check eternally? Really? The mind is abstract and cannot be measured, yes they practice behavioral modification by use of medications that make you feel so sick, you just assume agree and leave the hospital.
But I have no psychiatric profile, I fact it may well be my duty to put an end to psychiatry as we know it.
In A HEARING BY A PANEL OF FEDERAL JUSTICES, IT WAS UPHELD THAT I HAD THE RIGHT TO REFUSE, PSYCJIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY AND PYSCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS, UNDER THE 1ST AMENDMENT, RIGHTS TO RELIGIOUS PRACTICES. AND ROE V. WADE, IN MY OPINION THE MISINTERPRETATION OF ABORTION AND THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED IS THE CAUSE FOR MANY PEOPLE TO BE HELD IN PRISON FOR EXTENSIVE SENTENCES WITHOUT BEING CONVICTED. FOR EXAMPLE, I WAS HELD BY THE COUNTY OF HIGHLANDS FOR 904 DAYS CONSECUTIVELY, WITHOUT WAIVING MY RIGHTS TO A SPEEDY TRIAL. MEANWHILE, THEY DID THIS TO 100’S OF PEOPLE CLAIMING CONTINUED, OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND HELD MANY PEOPLE EXENSIVELY TO BILL THE STATE OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Due to the misinterpretation of the court’s decision that abortion is constitutional. Yes, The Morning after pill for mortals will probably prevent the fertilization process, wherefore, abort or prevent the pregnancy. But in this case ROE Argued that the unborn child had a right to representation and she being WADE CLAIMED A WOMAN’s CHOICE, WHEREFORE, MARRIAG WAS DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL, BECAUSE WHAT SHE DO HER BODY IS HER DECISION AND NOT A JOINT DECISION.
THE PROBLEM AND THE MISINTERPRETATION IN TBE CASE WAS SHE BEING WADE WAS IN HER THIRD TRIMESTER ,WHEREFORE, SHE WAS ALREADY PREGNANT, TO ABORT IS TO PREVENT, LIKE A ROCKET SHUTDOWN DURING COUNTDOWN, BUT ONCE LIVE, IT HAS TO BE SHOT OUT THE SKY, SAME WITH PREGNANCY, THE MORNING AFTER PILL WILL PREVENT OR ABORT, BUT THE NEEDLE UP YOU IS A TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY AND NOT AN ABORTION.
IN THE CASE WITH MANY, BECAUSE THEY DID NOT HAVE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS THEY WERE HELD WITHOUT PROPERTY DUE PROCESS, WHEREFORE, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT HAVE YOYR CIVIL RIGHTS WHICH DID, BUT MANY DID NOT, BUT THEY HAVE THEIR MARANDA RIGHTS.
ROE V WADE – MARRIAGE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL – Supported by The Declaration of Independence
MAPP V. OHIO – VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS – HE PLEADED GUILTY TO A CRIME NOT IN THE BOOKS AND WITHOUT ELEMENTS TO A CONVICTION – WHICH LED TO NIXON COMMITING OBSCRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
MARANDA V. ARIZONA – DUE PROCESS AND THE MARANDA RIGHTS.
GOTA DR. FRANK PAUL JONES, M.D.